So often, people and ideas getting criticised and slammed are often unable to present their opinion, lest they subject them-selves to further backlash, suppression and vilified criticism. Today's generation has a soppy Politically Correct media which whinges about anybody who says something even slightly against mainstream ideology, before finding various ways to degrade them. On an international scale, an even more frightening following has picked up. Its followers publicly proclaim the validity of this idea, unwilling to hear the other side of the argument. Global Warming, for all the rather fantastic claims it makes still remains a mere theory among the scientific community. How ironic that the main public promoters of Global Warming are largely con artists using scare tactics to extort vast amounts of money through regulation and taxation. Large organisations such as the European Union and United Nations seeking to further extend their power and control. And do not forget the ("alleged") climate scientist's garrulous proclamations of doom and disaster if we do not act immediately. One can't go any further without saying "I smell a rat." Global warming is not man made.
The post "Climate Change's founding Fathers" gives an overview about how Al Gore, Maurice Strong and Dr. Benjamin Santer's influence on creating Global Warming today, with all its frills, scare tactics and hair-brained solutions. Deviating ever so slightly from mainstream thought and it does not take long to realise that governments, businessmen and communities are latching on purely out of their own financial interests. Case in point number one, the Emissions Trading Scheme. Many New Zealanders (and Australians in July) have yet to see any benefit apart from extra taxation this rather bogus revenue spinner has brought about in reducing the allegedly "sky high" carbon emissions produced by New Zealand. Quite a rational argument can be made that removing the Emissions trading scheme will have no impact whatsoever on C02 levels among western countries. Many citizens of developed nations are very sensitive indeed to the environment; many are opposed to vast degradation of the Amazon Rainforest, many prefer walking whenever they possibly can, and support the improvements in public transport. Do not for a moment think the ETS tax will be removed. Carbon credit trading is unlikely to be changed either, and vice versa with these phony businesses helping companies trade with them. Money makes the warmists world go round. So long as they are able to extract small fortunes out of you, nothing else matters. Just ask Maurice Strong,the mastermind behind the climate change scare tactic, now specialising in selling high polluting Chinese cars to the United States.
Suppression and ridicule are frequently used by Green groups in response to objections from the "skeptics." Many climate change skeptics who comment on the potential falseness of it are shunned. William M. Gray, famous for pioneering methods, tools and measurements used to predict hurricanes has had vast amounts of government funding suppressed. The reason for this funding cut? Speaking out against global warming. Reducing Mr. Gray's funding is not merely an attack on Global Warming, it's an attack on free speech as well, from the politically correct brigade. http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003040068_warming05.html. Bjorn Lomborg, author of the Skeptical Environmentalist received a huge level of criticism, simply for giving an account from a skeptical viewpoint, reaching conclusions which differed from (the waste of taxpayer money), the International Panel on Climate Change." Journalist Mark Lynas cream pied Lombord in the face in 2001. Since then, he has withdrawn many of his idealistic views on the green craze saying "I once even threw a pie in the face of a Danish scientist who dared to question the orthodox environmental line. So what changed? Through research, I found that much of what I believed about environmental issues had little, if any, basis in science. Put simply, though my concerns were right, my solutions were wrong." http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2010981/You-mustnt-believe-lies-Green-zealots-And-I-know--I-one.html#ixzz1wPoXOJJS Lynas has now created many new enemies who used to be his allies in rallying for "mass taxation, giant suppression, and insane adjustments to daily life."
Many inconvenient truths arise, so in order to dispel this myth, good evidence needs to be brought forth. A half baked effort to disprove it due to its wiliness isn't sufficient. Recent studies, as reported in The Telegraph newspaper indicate that "today's temperatures are neither the warmest over the past millennium, nor are they producing the most extreme weather - in stark contrast to the claims of the environmentalists." Green fanatics have worked hard to explain the reasons behind this, from "the world being warmer in some places was cancelled out by other places where it was cooler," to "we can't trust this as evidence ." Among further evidences, the supposed mass melting across Antarctica as a whole, recent reports suggest otherwise. While the western section is still melting (which is happening faster as a result of the natural warming occurring), for the argument to hold firm, the entire continent must be suffering similar repercussions as a result of man's reckless polluting addiction. According to Glaciology Program head Scientist Dr. Ian Allison "Sea ice conditions have remained stable in Antarctica generally." There again, the quote from the rather ill informed blogger comes to mind: "the world being warmer in some places was cancelled out by other places where it was cooler." Warmer in some areas, cooler in others is a flat statement. One must also remember that records only began in the late 19th century, right about the time coal factories were being replaced by more modern forms of energy. It remains uncertain whether or not one can assert that Britain is producing more C02 emissions now than when King William IV and Queen Victoria were in charge, but going by information from books and paintings, there were vast amounts of pollution billowing out into the air from huge coal powered factories.
Fireplaces, were the primary sources of heat for households, spewing even more icky mess into the air. Despite the significantly lower population, there reason to suggest and believe the coal powered factories had more detrimental effects and higher C02 emissions than the modern sources of energy and internal heating methods.
Do not be afraid. Island nations are not sinking, the world will not be uninhabitable in 100 years, and we will not be planet-less. Take some time to assess the case for Global Warming, analyse it with a high degree of skepticism. If some alleged climate scientist simply says "I know," don't believe it. Whether or not you want to believe in it is your choice, but do not become a herded sheep. Open your eyes and seek the truth. So far, the truth about Global Warming is that there's no scientific consensus yet that man made emissions are contributing to the earth getting warmer.
No comments:
Post a Comment